• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

PPM for electric vehicles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bluenile
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 285
  • Views Views: Views 10,949
To raise revenue. Why is it fair to tax pensions when they've been accrued over a lifetime of saving (from after tax funds)?
Take one of the benefits that isn’t part of taxable income (some benefits are actually taxable, like Jobseeker’s Allowance but ignore that for now), like Universal credit.

It’s based on need. And comes from the government. So what you suggest is that the government gives someone universal credit, takes some of it back in taxes and then has to increase the amount of universal credit given as it no longer covers need. So the net amount someone receives is the same as they get now but now there’s a bigger starting amount and tax paid on that. No extra revenue, lots of admin and extra costs.

Sounds like a plan.
 
Our street has residents parking but outside our house isn't marked as one of the residents bays so 'randoms' are forever parking there - more often than not I can't park outside my own house 🤷‍♂️
I've always wondered about that, noticed it quite a few times over the Manselton/Brynhyfryd area, there will be all lines designating residents only parking, then a few houses will have absolutely nothing, then it carries on with the residents only bays. I really don't get that at all, it's not fair on the resident who has not got a residents only bay outside their house, I wonder why they would even do that? Seems crazy to me.
 
I've always wondered about that, noticed it quite a few times over the Manselton/Brynhyfryd area, there will be all lines designating residents only parking, then a few houses will have absolutely nothing, then it carries on with the residents only bays. I really don't get that at all, it's not fair on the resident who has not got a residents only bay outside their house, I wonder why they would even do that? Seems crazy to me.
Swansea Council policy is 50% marked as residents parking.
This seems to be a common practice gor Councils across the country
 
I wonder if this will be enough to make a difference in medium to long term market shift. There isn’t a week go buy where I don’t see a cut in future EV demand or even cancellation of models. The prolonging of ICE supply chain contracts is very much a thing these days.
 
I wonder if this will be enough to make a difference in medium to long term market shift. There isn’t a week go buy where I don’t see a cut in future EV demand or even cancellation of models. The prolonging of ICE supply chain contracts is very much a thing these days.
One thing I’ve learned from many years in policy making is that whatever you do, it’s never enough.
 
That money doesn’t go to the Treasury so isn’t doing anything to replace the lost fuel duty.

Congestion charges contribute to business rates which go to the treasury so indirectly car owners pay. Although the purpose is for congestion charges is to reinvest in cleaner air and infrastructure. .
 
Congestion charges contribute to business rates which go to the treasury so indirectly car owners pay. Although the purpose is for congestion charges is to reinvest in cleaner air and infrastructure.
Ok not sure what point you’re making but ok
 
Yes, but who? You’ve been asked loads of times and you just say it’s not your job to know,

The EV thing is absolutely fair. There is a gap in finances and they are filling it. What’s the problem? Or are you saying those who pay £50k for a car are the struggling? In which case, our definition of struggling differs.

Most people don't buy new EV's especially in that £50K bracket.. a good percentage are leased through companies or a private plan. These people are not necessarily well off to be adding extra burdens.
 
Maybe we should let them do 70 through that effing painful Port Talbot ‘low pollution’ zone.
That would save about 2 minutes, wouldn't it 😆

Chill.

Can you tell I had to go on a speed awareness course? "Speeding is baaaaaad, M'kay"
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top